New York Times
June 24, 2004
House Panel Pushes World Bank Return to
Iraq
By REUTERS
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The World Bank's absence from Iraq under
the U.S.-led occupation drew criticism on Wednesday from an influential
congressional panel, which moved to pressure the lender to return
its staff and speed the disbursement of donations for Iraq's reconstruction.
The U.S. House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee
on Foreign Relations passed an amendment to a $19.4 billion foreign-aid
bill that would require the U.S. Treasury Department to report
on the bank's Iraq staffing and aid disbursements.
"The amendment that I offered and that was accepted was
criticizing the World Bank policy on deploying no staff, calling
attention to the slow disbursements and requiring the Treasury
Department to do a report to the committee by January,'' said
Rep. Mark Kirk, a Republican from Illinois.
The subcommittee, which sets funding for the U.S. contribution
to the World Bank, did not provide copies of the amendment.
The panel's action was seen as move to pressure the World Bank
through the Treasury Department, the government agency which manages
U.S. participation in the international lender.
The World Bank withdrew its staff from Iraq last year after the
bombing of the United Nations' headquarters in Baghdad. President
James Wolfensohn has said he will not send staff back until it
is safe. In the meantime the bank is doing Iraq work from an office
in Jordan.
A donors conference in Madrid last year raised $32 billion in
loans and grants to rebuild war-torn Iraq. The United Nations
and the World Bank agreed to manage the money in an international
trust fund.
The bill also cut overall funding for the bank by $90 million
from last year's levels and by $224 million from President Bush's
budget request. The subcommittee gave no explanation for the cut.
In a blow for Bush's aid policies toward poor countries, the
panel cut a separate $200 million bonus payment for the bank's
lending arm for the poorest nations.
The Treasury Department had been pushing for the extra money
after the bank was found to have met and exceeded performance
targets at its concessional lending arm, the International Development
Association.
Copyright© 2004 New York Times
|